
Three Markets on the Future of Events
Six years after the pandemic emptied convention halls worldwide, WTCA Meridian's Editorial Team asked leaders from three World Trade Center businesses, spanning Southeast Asia, Southern Africa, and the Gulf how the conferences and exhibitions industry has changed and where it is headed. Their answers, gathered independently, arrive at the same conclusion from three different markets: technology is remaking how events are planned and personalized, but it is raising the value of being in the room, not replacing it.
Read on to hear from leaders at Dubai World Trade Centre, World Trade Center Durban, and World Trade Center Metro Manila.
What the Pandemic Actually Changed
None of the three leaders describe an industry that shrank after COVID. They describe one that got more demanding.
At WTC Metro Manila, Pamela D. Pascual, Chairman and CEO, says the shift has been toward partnership: "We have become much more focused on being a partner to our clients, not just providing space, but helping them make their events more meaningful." The trade center is backing that shift with a major expansion timed to its 30th anniversary, a bet that demand for quality face-to-face events will keep growing.
At WTC Durban, CEO Lindiwe Rakharebe describes a similar rise in expectations: " Organizers now expect venues to deliver comprehensive event solutions, not just space, including hybrid capabilities, sustainability credentials, and measurable legacy outcomes." Durban has responded with in-house technical expertise, a dedicated hybrid event studio, and what Rakharebe calls a "legacy-first" approach: designing events for lasting value to organizers, delegates, and the surrounding community, not just the day itself.
At Dubai World Trade Centre, Diego Cortese, VP Venue Commercial, puts the emphasis on trust rebuilt through physical presence: "We have seen a stronger appreciation for what can only happen when people are in the same room: building trust, having spontaneous conversations and turning connections into business." DWTC's response has been to make its venues more flexible and connected, while investing in the infrastructure and services organizers now expect as standard.
Three markets, three strategies, and the same underlying read: the pandemic did not lower the bar for events. It raised it.
AI as Enabler, Not Substitute
All three leaders were asked what technology will still matter in five to ten years, and all three gave the same answer with different emphasis: AI will personalize the event experience, but it will not replace the human one.
Pascual is direct about the limit: "Technology is only valuable if it makes the experience better for the client and the participant. I do not think technology will replace the human side of events. In fact, I think it will make the human side even more important."
Cortese frames AI as a navigation tool for scale, helping attendees cut through an overload of options: "One of the biggest opportunities is using AI, data and personalization to help audiences navigate the sheer scale of events and the abundance of companies, products and content, so they can find what is most relevant to them rather than feel overwhelmed by choice." The stated goal is automation that identifies the right people to meet and arranges the meeting, with the technology doing more of the matching work over time.
Rakharebe adds real-time translation and immersive experiences to the list of technologies already reshaping delivery, and names the constraint plainly: "Technology will remain an enabler rather than a replacement for human interaction. The value of bringing people together in the same room will remain fundamental to our industry."
Hybrid Didn't Replace In-Person. It Raised the Bar for It.
Ask any of the three whether virtual formats cannibalized in-person attendance, and the answer is no, but the follow-up is consistent: hybrid changed what in-person now has to deliver.
Rakharebe puts it most plainly: "Hybrid and virtual events have not eliminated the demand for face-to-face events; rather, they have raised the bar for what an in-person event needs to deliver." She points to a shift in how ROI itself is measured, toward quality of engagement and business outcomes rather than headcount.
Cortese's account echoes this: "The anticipated shift away from physical events did not materialize." Hybrid's value, in this account, is extension and reach, not replacement, and the strongest business outcomes still trace back to in-person connection.
Pascual frames the same shift as an adaptation challenge for venues: "There will be no real substitute to face-to-face events. The challenge for us is to quickly adapt to the use of digital tools to complement the physical event and make the overall experience and return on investment even better."
What Makes a Destination Competitive Now
Here the three answers diverge in specifics but agree on structure: no venue wins alone. Competitiveness is a citywide proposition.
Cortese frames this most explicitly as an ecosystem argument, pointing to Dubai's decades of investment in aviation, transport, hospitality, and tourism infrastructure, activated citywide by events like GITEX Global and Gulfood: "Competitiveness is no longer about the venue alone; it is about the entire ecosystem around it." DWTC's own pitch to organizers is an end-to-end offering, from production and hospitality through the full event journey.
Rakharebe names the same ecosystem logic for Durban, adding that success depends on venue, city, tourism authorities, and the business community working together, and grounds it in place: "Durban has a particularly powerful proposition because it combines a world-class convention facility with a vibrant coastal destination, diverse cultural experiences and access to some of Africa's most distinctive natural and tourism assets."
Pascual's version centers on service as the differentiator once the infrastructure basics are in place: "A venue partner who is responsive, flexible, and understands what they [clients] are trying to achieve makes a huge difference. For us, that's where WTC Metro Manila has always tried to differentiate itself."
The Younger Professional Is Rewriting the Agenda
Closing the interview, all three leaders describe the same shift in what younger attendees will tolerate: passive programming is losing.
Pascual: "Younger professionals want to be engaged. They don't want to simply sit through presentations for hours; they instead prefer interaction, relevant content, networking and experiences that are worth their time."
Cortese frames it as a shift in what counts as content: "Younger professionals expect events to be more immersive, relevant and personalized, with the nature of the experience becoming as important as the content itself. They want to feel actively engaged rather than simply being an audience."
Rakharebe adds a values dimension specific to Durban's programming response: "They also demand authenticity and purpose, favoring events that address pressing global challenges like climate change, inequality, and social justice." WTC Durban is answering with interactive formats, co-creation opportunities, and social impact programming built into its venue offerings.
Three markets, three strategies, and the same finding: none of these leaders describe technology as a threat to the industry. They describe it as the reason the room now has to work harder. Sharper personalization, faster matching, richer data on who should meet whom. What hasn't changed is what happens once people are actually there. That part, all three agree, is still the whole point.
The Meridian editorial team thanks Diego Cortese (Dubai World Trade Centre), Lindiwe Rakharebe (WTC Durban), and Pamela D. Pascual (WTC Metro Manila and WTCA Board of Directors) for their contributions to this feature. To learn more about each of their WTC businesses, find them on LinkedIn:
- https://www.linkedin.com/company/dubai-world-trade-centre Â
- https://za.linkedin.com/company/durbanicc
- https://www.linkedin.com/company/wtcmm/






